{"id":72497,"date":"2026-10-02T12:11:52","date_gmt":"2026-10-02T19:11:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/?p=72497"},"modified":"2026-10-07T13:45:00","modified_gmt":"2026-10-07T20:45:00","slug":"rolex-124300-vs-134300","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html","title":{"rendered":"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Actually Changed on the Oyster Perpetual 41"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Rolex Oyster Perpetual 41 ref. 134300 isn&#8217;t a mechanical replacement for the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex\/oyster_perpetual_41-124300\">Rolex 124300<\/a>. It&#8217;s more of a refinement, a familiar watch Rolex quietly reworked around the edges.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The basics haven&#8217;t changed. Both references measure 41mm, use Rolex&#8217;s Caliber 3230, and offer 100 meters of water resistance. But spend some time with each watch on the wrist and the differences become easier to notice. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex\/oyster_perpetual_41-134300\">Rolex 134300<\/a> has a larger winding crown, slimmer-looking reshaped lugs, a thinner Oysterclasp, and a new mix of dial colors and finishes. None of that sounds revolutionary on paper. Together, though, they give the newer Oyster Perpetual a slightly different character.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Key takeaways<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Movement, power reserve, water resistance, bracelet, and case diameter are identical. The update is ergonomic and cosmetic, not mechanical.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The 134300&#8217;s changes are a bigger Twinlock crown, thinner lugs with a sharper angle, a slimmer Oysterclasp, and matte lacquer dials instead of glossy ones.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>On the pre-owned market, the 134300 sells for more than the 124300 in every dial color they share: Bob&#8217;s median is $11,995 versus $10,595, based on completed sales from October 2025 through September 2026.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The discontinued 124300 dials are the exception. A Turquoise 124300 has sold for roughly 2.6 times a standard-dial example in that same window.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If you already own a 124300, keep it, unless a 134300-only dial is the reason you&#8217;re shopping.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That&#8217;s the short version. The longer one is more interesting, because the changes Rolex made are small enough to miss in a photo and big enough to feel on the wrist. Here&#8217;s how I&#8217;d walk a buyer through the two watches, starting with the full list of what Rolex touched. If you&#8217;d rather see both references in metal, our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-oyster-perpetual-41-1.html\">Rolex Oyster Perpetual 41<\/a> page has them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What Changed From the Rolex 124300 to the 134300?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-dials-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"Rolex 124300 vs 134300 Side by Side\" class=\"wp-image-72501\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-dials-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-dials-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-dials-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-dials-1536x1025.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-dials.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Less than the forums suggest, and more than a reference-number bump. Rolex left everything mechanical alone and reworked the parts your fingers and wrist actually touch. The table has the whole list; the two sections after it sort the changes by how much they matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>124300 vs 134300 at a glance:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\t<div class=\"container-xl pt-4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"row\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-12\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"container-fluid px-4 px-xl-5 py-4 rounded mb-4 shadow\" style=\"background-color: var(--color-white);\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"table-responsive\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<table class=\"serialNumbers table table-striped\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feature<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Ref. 124300<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Ref. 134300<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Case<\/td><td>41mm, Oystersteel<\/td><td>41mm, Oystersteel<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Case thickness<\/td><td>11.6mm&nbsp;<\/td><td>11.6mm&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lug width<\/td><td>21mm&nbsp;<\/td><td>21mm&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lug shape<\/td><td>Broader, slab-sided<\/td><td>Thinner, sharper angle<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Crown<\/td><td>Screw-down Twinlock<\/td><td>Screw-down Twinlock, enlarged<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Clasp<\/td><td>Folding Oysterclasp, 5mm Easylink<\/td><td>Folding Oysterclasp, 5mm Easylink, slimmer profile<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Colored dial finish<\/td><td>Glossy lacquer<\/td><td>Matte lacquer&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Dial text<\/td><td>Standard placement<\/td><td>&#8220;Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified&#8221; sits higher&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Movement<\/td><td>Caliber 3230<\/td><td>Caliber 3230<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Power reserve<\/td><td>Approx. 70 hours<\/td><td>Approx. 70 hours<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Water resistance<\/td><td>100m \/ 330ft<\/td><td>100m \/ 330ft<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Production<\/td><td>2020 to 2025&nbsp;<\/td><td>2025 to present<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Rolex 134300 keeps the 124300&#8217;s 41mm Oystersteel case, Caliber 3230 movement, roughly 70-hour power reserve, 100-meter water resistance, and Oyster bracelet with the 5mm Easylink extension. Those figures are listed on rolex.com for the current reference and carry for the older one. The differences are an enlarged Twinlock crown, thinner and more sharply angled lugs, a slimmer folding Oysterclasp, and a switch from glossy to matte lacquer on the colored dials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What stayed the same<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Case diameter and material: 41mm Oystersteel, domed bezel, screw-down caseback.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Movement: Caliber 3230, Rolex&#8217;s time-only automatic, with the Chronergy escapement and a Superlative Chronometer rating of plus or minus two seconds a day.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Power reserve: approximately 70 hours in both.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Water resistance: 100 meters, with the Twinlock crown doing the sealing in both.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Bracelet: three-link Oyster with the 5mm Easylink extension in the clasp.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you came looking for a mechanical reason to pick one over the other, there isn&#8217;t one. Same engine, same rating, same service interval.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What changed, and how much it matters<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The crown is the change you&#8217;ll notice on day one. The 124300&#8217;s crown was on the small side for a 41mm case, and winding it felt like more work than it should on a watch this size. Rolex made the 134300&#8217;s noticeably larger. It&#8217;s easier to unscrew, easier to grip, and visually it sits in better proportion to the case. If you only wind on Monday morning, this matters less; if you let the watch run down every weekend, it matters a lot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The lugs come second. They&#8217;re thinner and meet the case at a sharper angle, which changes how the watch sits more than any photo suggests. The next section has our measurements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The clasp is third. The folding Oysterclasp is slimmer on the underside, which you feel against a desk edge or a shirt cuff and nowhere else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dial finish is taste, not improvement. The glossy lacquer on the 124300&#8217;s colored dials throws light around; the matte lacquer on the 134300 absorbs it and reads as one even tone. Some people call that sophisticated. Some people call it flat. Both are right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dial text placement is a loupe-only change. Collectors enjoy arguing about it. You will never see it from arm&#8217;s length.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>How Does the Rolex 134300 Wear Compared to the 124300?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"Rolex 134300 Oyster Perpetual Watch\" class=\"wp-image-72502\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-oyster-perpetual-watch-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-oyster-perpetual-watch-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1536x1025.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-oyster-perpetual-watch.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"Rolex 124300 Oyster Perpetual Watch\" class=\"wp-image-72503\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1536x1025.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Closer to the wrist, mostly because of the lugs. Rolex doesn&#8217;t publish a lug-to-lug figure for either reference, and I don&#8217;t trust the numbers circulating online, so we put calipers on both.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\t<div class=\"container-xl pt-4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"row\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-12\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"container-fluid px-4 px-xl-5 py-4 rounded mb-4 shadow\" style=\"background-color: var(--color-white);\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"table-responsive\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<table class=\"serialNumbers table table-striped\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Measurement<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Ref. 124300<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Ref. 134300<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lug-to-lug<\/td><td>47.5mm<\/td><td>46mm<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Case thickness<\/td><td>11.4 &#8211; 11.6mm<\/td><td>11.6-11.7mm<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Crown diameter<\/td><td>Standard\/Smaller<\/td><td>Larger Twinlock Crown<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Clasp thickness<\/td><td>Standard profile<\/td><td>Slimmer \/ Thinner profile<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The 124300 was never a badly proportioned watch. It wore large for a time-only Rolex, which was exactly why a lot of buyers wanted it over the 36mm version. What the 134300 fixes is the one complaint that comes up most often about the original: that it ran a little long across the wrist for a case that wasn&#8217;t trying to be a sports watch. If you liked the presence of the 124300 but felt that length, the 134300 is the version you were waiting for. If you never noticed it, you won&#8217;t miss anything by sticking with the older reference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The on-wrist footage is in the video at the top of this page. Skip to the &#8220;Which One Wears Better?&#8221; chapter if that&#8217;s the only question you came with.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>134300 vs 124300 Dial Lineups: What You Can Only Get on Each<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-with-green-dial-in-stainless-steel-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"Rolex 134300 OP with Green Dial\" class=\"wp-image-72505\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-with-green-dial-in-stainless-steel-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-with-green-dial-in-stainless-steel-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-with-green-dial-in-stainless-steel-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-with-green-dial-in-stainless-steel-1536x1025.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-134300-with-green-dial-in-stainless-steel.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The dial list is where the two references stop being near-twins. The 124300 is the loud one. The 134300 is the quiet one. And the colors that made the 124300 famous didn&#8217;t survive the changeover.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\t<div class=\"container-xl pt-4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"row\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-12\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"container-fluid px-4 px-xl-5 py-4 rounded mb-4 shadow\" style=\"background-color: var(--color-white);\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"table-responsive\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<table class=\"serialNumbers table table-striped\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Dial<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Ref. 124300<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Ref. 134300<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Turquoise<\/td><td>Offered; discontinued with the reference<\/td><td>Not offered<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Coral Red<\/td><td>Offered; discontinued with the reference<\/td><td>Not offered<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Yellow<\/td><td>Offered; discontinued with the reference<\/td><td>Not offered<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Celebration<\/td><td>Offered; discontinued with the reference<\/td><td>Not offered<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Green<\/td><td>Offered, glossy lacquer<\/td><td>Offered, matte lacquer<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Silver<\/td><td>Offered, sunray<\/td><td>Offered, sunray<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Black<\/td><td>Offered, sunray<\/td><td>Offered, matte lacquer<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Blue<\/td><td>Offered, sunray<\/td><td>Offered, matte lacquer<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Pistachio<\/td><td>Not offered<\/td><td>Offered<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Beige<\/td><td>Not offered<\/td><td>Offered<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lavender<\/td><td>Not offered<\/td><td>Offered<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sources for the 134300 column are the current model pages on rolex.com; the 124300 column carries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The finish change matters more than the color names. A glossy lacquer dial is a different object outdoors than indoors: the 124300&#8217;s green goes from deep forest under a lamp to something close to neon in direct sun. The 134300&#8217;s matte lacquer doesn&#8217;t do that. Pistachio reads as pistachio at noon and at dinner, which is either the whole appeal or the whole problem, depending on why you wanted a colored Rolex in the first place. If Rolex&#8217;s own 2020 launch materials describe what inspired the glossy lacquer dials, that belongs here in one sentence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the collector, the table says one thing clearly. The Oyster Perpetual Turquoise dial, the Coral Red, the Yellow, and the Celebration exist only on a 124300, and only on the pre-owned market. For the buyer who wants the current look, the 134300 Pistachio and Beige are the two dials that didn&#8217;t exist before 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Was the Rolex 124300 Discontinued?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-with-black-dial-in-stainless-steel-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"Rolex 124300\" class=\"wp-image-72506\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-with-black-dial-in-stainless-steel-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-with-black-dial-in-stainless-steel-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-with-black-dial-in-stainless-steel-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-with-black-dial-in-stainless-steel-1536x1025.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-with-black-dial-in-stainless-steel.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yes. Rolex introduced the Oyster Perpetual 41 ref. 124300 in 2020 and replaced it with the ref. 134300 at Watches and Wonders in April 2025. As of October 2026, no 124300 appears in the current Oyster Perpetual catalog on rolex.com.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What makes this unusual is that Rolex didn&#8217;t retire a watch that was struggling. The 124300 was the reference that took the Oyster Perpetual from the understated entry point in the catalog to one of the most talked-about Rolex watches of the early 2020s, almost entirely on the strength of those dials. Five years is a short run for a Rolex reference. Rolex retired it anyway, and the replacement changed the ergonomics rather than the formula. That tells you the 134300 is a refinement of something that already worked, not a correction of something that didn&#8217;t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Discontinuation is also where the collector conversation starts, because a short run plus retired colors is the usual recipe for a reference people chase later. Whether that has shown up in actual sold prices is a data question, and the next section answers it with our numbers rather than forum sentiment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Rolex 124300 vs 134300 Price: Retail and Pre-Owned Values<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"737\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/pre-owned-rolex-124300-vs-134300-side-by-side-comparison-1024x737.jpg\" alt=\"Pre-Owned Rolex 124300 vs 134300 Side By Side Comparison\" class=\"wp-image-72508\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/pre-owned-rolex-124300-vs-134300-side-by-side-comparison-1024x737.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/pre-owned-rolex-124300-vs-134300-side-by-side-comparison-300x216.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/pre-owned-rolex-124300-vs-134300-side-by-side-comparison-768x553.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/pre-owned-rolex-124300-vs-134300-side-by-side-comparison-1536x1106.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/pre-owned-rolex-124300-vs-134300-side-by-side-comparison.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two separate questions hide inside &#8220;what does it cost.&#8221; One is what Rolex charges for the reference it still makes. The other is what both references actually sell for on the secondary market, which is the only place you can buy a 124300 at all. I&#8217;ll keep them apart, because mixing them is how people end up confused about whether a watch is &#8220;over retail.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Current retail price of the 134300<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Oyster Perpetual 41 ref. 134300 in Oystersteel lists at $7,050 at Rolex authorized dealers in the United States as of October 2026, per the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rolex.com\/en-us\/watches\/oyster-perpetual\/m134300-0009\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">current retail price on rolex.com<\/a>. Every current dial color carries the same list price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The 124300 has no current retail price. It&#8217;s out of the catalog, so the only number that applies to it is a historical one: its last list price before replacement. For a buyer today, that figure is trivia. The pre-owned market sets the price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>What the 124300 and 134300 sell for pre-owned<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\t<div class=\"container-xl pt-4\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"row\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-12\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"container-fluid px-4 px-xl-5 py-4 rounded mb-4 shadow\" style=\"background-color: var(--color-white);\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"table-responsive\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<table class=\"serialNumbers table table-striped\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Reference or dial<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Bob&#8217;s median sold price, Oct 2025 to Sep 2026<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Range<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>124300, all dials<\/td><td>$10,595<\/td><td>$9,387 to $27,495<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>124300, standard dials (Black, Blue, Green, Silver)<\/td><td>$10,320<\/td><td>$9,387 to $11,995<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>134300, all dials<\/td><td>$11,995<\/td><td>$10,295 to $12,995<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>134300, Pistachio and Beige<\/td><td>$12,995<\/td><td>$12,595 to $12,995<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Based on completed Bob&#8217;s Watches transactions from October 2025 through September 2026, the Rolex 134300 sold for a median of $11,995 and the 124300 for a median of $10,595. The newer reference brought more in every dial color the two share: Green sold at a median of $11,695 on the 124300 and $11,995 on the 134300; Blue at $10,595 against $11,495; Black at $9,845 against $10,595; and Silver at $9,995 against $10,645. Those are sold prices, not asking prices, for watches that passed our authentication and sold through our site in that twelve-month window.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Read that next to the retail figure and you get the obvious point: as of September 2026, the pre-owned 134300 median ($11,995, Bob&#8217;s completed sales) sat well above the current retail price ($7,050, rolex.com). The two numbers describe different markets, and I&#8217;m not going to add them together into a &#8220;premium&#8221; figure, but anyone who has tried to buy a current-production steel Rolex at list knows why the gap exists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The discontinued dials are a different story, and it&#8217;s the story that explains the 124300&#8217;s wide range. In the same window, a Turquoise 124300 sold for roughly 2.6 times the median of a standard-dial version. The Celebration dial sold for roughly 2.1 times. The Yellow sold for roughly 1.8 times. Because these dials trade in smaller numbers, individual transactions can have a meaningful effect on the observed prices, so these multiples should be viewed as a snapshot of our completed sales rather than a prediction of future values.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The standard-dial 124300 shows a relatively modest change over the period covered by our data. In Bob&#8217;s completed sales, the quarterly median increased from $9,795 in the first quarter of 2025 to $10,595 in the third quarter of 2026, an increase of about 8%. The larger step up occurred in the quarters after Rolex announced the 134300 replacement. That gives us a useful picture of how the standard-dial 124300 has traded through this period, but it shouldn&#8217;t be treated as a forecast for where prices go next.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A word on the collecting angle, since it comes up with every discontinued Rolex. Certain 124300 dials have clearly held value and carry a premium today. That premium rests on scarcity, condition, and whether the watch comes with its box and papers, and none of it is guaranteed to hold. No Rolex reference promises a profit, and I&#8217;d buy a Turquoise 124300 because I wanted to wear it, not because of what the next five years of sold data might show. If you own one of those dials and you&#8217;re curious what it&#8217;s worth now, you can <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/sell-rolex-watch\">sell your Rolex<\/a> to us or just get a number.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Pricing analysis is based on completed Bob&#8217;s Watches transactions from October 2025 through September 2026, not current asking prices. Current retail is from rolex.com as of the date of publication.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Should You Upgrade From a 124300 to a 134300?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"682\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/wrist-shot-light-blue-dial-rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1024x682.jpg\" alt=\"Rolex 124300 on Wrist\" class=\"wp-image-64831\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/wrist-shot-light-blue-dial-rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1024x682.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/wrist-shot-light-blue-dial-rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/wrist-shot-light-blue-dial-rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/wrist-shot-light-blue-dial-rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/wrist-shot-light-blue-dial-rolex-124300-oyster-perpetual-watch.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For most owners, no. The 134300 doesn&#8217;t give you a new movement, more water resistance, or a function you didn&#8217;t have. It gives you a better crown, a slightly shorter stance, and a thinner clasp. Those are real improvements, and none of them is worth selling a watch you already like in order to buy back nearly the same watch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The data makes the case harder, not easier. A standard-dial 124300 owner who trades up pays a pre-owned premium of roughly $300 to $900 at the median for the same color on the 134300, based on our completed sales from October 2025 through September 2026. And a Turquoise, Celebration, or Yellow owner is giving up a dial that sells for a multiple of the standard version in exchange for a crown. That&#8217;s a bad trade on paper and a worse one in person.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There are two exceptions. The first is dial: if Pistachio or Beige is the watch you actually want, no amount of 124300 appreciation changes that, and the 134300 is the only way to get it. The second is fit: if the 124300&#8217;s length across the wrist has bothered you since the day you bought it, the 134300 fixes the thing that bothers you, and that&#8217;s worth paying for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you do decide to switch, trade-in is the simplest route, since it collapses two transactions into one and the dial premium on a discontinued 124300 works in your favor on the way out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Which Oyster Perpetual 41 Should You Buy?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"698\" src=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Rolex-Oyster-Perpetual-41-124300-watch-16-1024x698.jpg\" alt=\"Rolex 124300 Watch Collection\" class=\"wp-image-43785\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Rolex-Oyster-Perpetual-41-124300-watch-16-1024x698.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Rolex-Oyster-Perpetual-41-124300-watch-16-300x205.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Rolex-Oyster-Perpetual-41-124300-watch-16-768x524.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Rolex-Oyster-Perpetual-41-124300-watch-16-557x380.jpg 557w, https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Rolex-Oyster-Perpetual-41-124300-watch-16.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The one whose dial you&#8217;ll still want in ten years. Everything else about these two watches is close enough that the dial decides it, and the dial lists don&#8217;t overlap where it counts. Ripley Sellers, Contributing Editor, put it this way in our video: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>&#8220;The 124300 was expressive and loud. The 134300 is subtle and sophisticated. Neither is inherently better, they&#8217;re just different.&#8221;<br><\/em><br>Ripley Sellers, Contributing Editor at Bob&#8217;s Watches<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you&#8217;re browsing <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-oyster-perpetual-1.html\">pre-owned Rolex Oyster Perpetual watches<\/a> and can&#8217;t decide, these are the lines I&#8217;d draw.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The 124300 is the right call if:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>You want one of the discontinued glossy dials: Turquoise, Coral Red, Yellow, or Celebration. Nothing in the current catalog replaces them.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>You like the bolder, slightly longer wrist presence of the original 41mm case.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>You want the reference that marks a specific chapter in modern Rolex, the one where the quiet model in the lineup suddenly wasn&#8217;t.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>You&#8217;d rather put the difference in price toward a dial than toward a crown.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The 134300 is the right call if:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>You want a current-production watch with the chance of buying it at an authorized dealer with a full factory warranty.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Pistachio, Beige, or the matte Green, Blue, or Black is the dial you keep coming back to.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The 124300&#8217;s lug-to-lug length is the thing that stopped you from buying one.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>You wind your watch often enough to care about the crown.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Bottom Line<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The 134300 is the better everyday watch, and I&#8217;d pick it for anyone who wants a time-only Rolex they&#8217;ll wear under a cuff more often than on a beach. The crown alone makes it the nicer one to live with. The 124300 with a discontinued dial is the better collector&#8217;s watch, and the sold data backs that up: those dials have held value since the reference was retired, and nothing Rolex makes today looks like them. If you already own a 124300 in any color, keep it. You&#8217;d be paying a premium to get back a watch you already have, minus the dial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At Bob&#8217;s Watches, we see both references cross the bench, and the pattern is consistent: the 134300 sells for more pre-owned than the 124300 in every shared color, and the 124300&#8217;s bright dials sell for far more than either. That&#8217;s the whole comparison in one sentence. The rest is which one you&#8217;d rather look down at, and the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 41 page is where you can start that argument with yourself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"cms_Faq cms_Faq_layoutDefault\" id=\"faq72497\"><h2 class=\"cms_Faq_title\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2><div class=\"accordion cms_Faq_accordion\" id=\"faq72497_accordion\"><div class=\"accordion-item cms_Faq_item\"><h3 class=\"accordion-header cms_Faq_question\" id=\"faq72497_h1\"><button class=\"accordion-button cms_Faq_toggle\" type=\"button\" data-bs-toggle=\"collapse\" data-bs-target=\"#faq72497_1\" aria-expanded=\"true\" aria-controls=\"faq72497_1\">Did the movement change between the 124300 and the 134300?<\/button><\/h3><div id=\"faq72497_1\" class=\"accordion-collapse collapse show\" aria-labelledby=\"faq72497_h1\"><div class=\"accordion-body cms_Faq_answer\">The Rolex Caliber 3230 powers both references, with the same roughly 70-hour power reserve and the same Superlative Chronometer rating of plus or minus two seconds a day. Rolex changed the case, crown, clasp, and dials for the 134300 and left the movement alone.<\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"accordion-item cms_Faq_item\"><h3 class=\"accordion-header cms_Faq_question\" id=\"faq72497_h2\"><button class=\"accordion-button cms_Faq_toggle\" type=\"button\" data-bs-toggle=\"collapse\" data-bs-target=\"#faq72497_2\" aria-expanded=\"true\" aria-controls=\"faq72497_2\">Is the 134300 thinner than the 124300?<\/button><\/h3><div id=\"faq72497_2\" class=\"accordion-collapse collapse show\" aria-labelledby=\"faq72497_h2\"><div class=\"accordion-body cms_Faq_answer\">Case thickness is the same on both references at 11.6mm. The 134300 wears slimmer because its lugs are thinner and its clasp has a lower profile, not because the case itself lost any height; our caliper figures are in the measurements table above.<\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"accordion-item cms_Faq_item\"><h3 class=\"accordion-header cms_Faq_question\" id=\"faq72497_h3\"><button class=\"accordion-button cms_Faq_toggle\" type=\"button\" data-bs-toggle=\"collapse\" data-bs-target=\"#faq72497_3\" aria-expanded=\"true\" aria-controls=\"faq72497_3\">Can you get the Turquoise or Celebration dial on the 134300?<\/button><\/h3><div id=\"faq72497_3\" class=\"accordion-collapse collapse show\" aria-labelledby=\"faq72497_h3\"><div class=\"accordion-body cms_Faq_answer\">The Turquoise and Celebration dials were discontinued and are not offered on the 134300. Both now exist only on the pre-owned market, which is why they sell at a multiple of a standard-dial 124300 in our completed sales.<\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"accordion-item cms_Faq_item\"><h3 class=\"accordion-header cms_Faq_question\" id=\"faq72497_h4\"><button class=\"accordion-button cms_Faq_toggle\" type=\"button\" data-bs-toggle=\"collapse\" data-bs-target=\"#faq72497_4\" aria-expanded=\"true\" aria-controls=\"faq72497_4\">Which Oyster Perpetual color is best?<\/button><\/h3><div id=\"faq72497_4\" class=\"accordion-collapse collapse show\" aria-labelledby=\"faq72497_h4\"><div class=\"accordion-body cms_Faq_answer\">Green is the safest answer, because it exists on both references and reads well in every light. Turquoise is the collector&#8217;s answer: based on Bob&#8217;s completed sales from October 2025 through September 2026, it sold for roughly 2.6 times a standard-dial 124300, which makes it the most sought-after dial in the lineup by a wide margin.<\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"accordion-item cms_Faq_item\"><h3 class=\"accordion-header cms_Faq_question\" id=\"faq72497_h5\"><button class=\"accordion-button cms_Faq_toggle\" type=\"button\" data-bs-toggle=\"collapse\" data-bs-target=\"#faq72497_5\" aria-expanded=\"true\" aria-controls=\"faq72497_5\">Is the Oyster Perpetual better than the Explorer?<\/button><\/h3><div id=\"faq72497_5\" class=\"accordion-collapse collapse show\" aria-labelledby=\"faq72497_h5\"><div class=\"accordion-body cms_Faq_answer\">The Oyster Perpetual 41 and the Explorer do different jobs with the same Caliber 3230 inside. The Oyster Perpetual is the dressier, more colorful time-only Rolex; the Explorer is the tool-watch version with its 3-6-9 dial and a smaller case, so the better watch is whichever matches how you&#8217;ll wear it.<\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"accordion-item cms_Faq_item\"><h3 class=\"accordion-header cms_Faq_question\" id=\"faq72497_h6\"><button class=\"accordion-button cms_Faq_toggle\" type=\"button\" data-bs-toggle=\"collapse\" data-bs-target=\"#faq72497_6\" aria-expanded=\"true\" aria-controls=\"faq72497_6\">What do owners say about the 124300?<\/button><\/h3><div id=\"faq72497_6\" class=\"accordion-collapse collapse show\" aria-labelledby=\"faq72497_h6\"><div class=\"accordion-body cms_Faq_answer\">Owner threads on the 124300 come back to three things: the dials people love, the crown that some found too small for the case, and a lug-to-lug length that wears bigger than the 41mm number suggests. The first is why the reference is collectible now; the second and third are exactly what Rolex changed on the 134300.<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Did the movement change between the 124300 and the 134300?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"The Rolex Caliber 3230 powers both references, with the same roughly 70-hour power reserve and the same Superlative Chronometer rating of plus or minus two seconds a day. Rolex changed the case, crown, clasp, and dials for the 134300 and left the movement alone.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Is the 134300 thinner than the 124300?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Case thickness is the same on both references at 11.6mm. The 134300 wears slimmer because its lugs are thinner and its clasp has a lower profile, not because the case itself lost any height; our caliper figures are in the measurements table above.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Can you get the Turquoise or Celebration dial on the 134300?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"The Turquoise and Celebration dials were discontinued and are not offered on the 134300. Both now exist only on the pre-owned market, which is why they sell at a multiple of a standard-dial 124300 in our completed sales.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Which Oyster Perpetual color is best?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Green is the safest answer, because it exists on both references and reads well in every light. Turquoise is the collector's answer: based on Bob's completed sales from October 2025 through September 2026, it sold for roughly 2.6 times a standard-dial 124300, which makes it the most sought-after dial in the lineup by a wide margin.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Is the Oyster Perpetual better than the Explorer?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"The Oyster Perpetual 41 and the Explorer do different jobs with the same Caliber 3230 inside. The Oyster Perpetual is the dressier, more colorful time-only Rolex; the Explorer is the tool-watch version with its 3-6-9 dial and a smaller case, so the better watch is whichever matches how you'll wear it.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What do owners say about the 124300?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Owner threads on the 124300 come back to three things: the dials people love, the crown that some found too small for the case, and a lug-to-lug length that wears bigger than the 41mm number suggests. The first is why the reference is collectible now; the second and third are exactly what Rolex changed on the 134300.\"}}]}<\/script>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Rolex Oyster Perpetual 41 ref. 134300 isn&#8217;t a mechanical replacement for the Rolex 124300. It&#8217;s more of a refinement, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":72500,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2374],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[2286],"class_list":["post-72497","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-editorial"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Changed on Oyster Perpetual 41<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Compare the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 124300 vs 134300 &amp; see what changed, including design, case, movement, dial options, and more.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Changed on Oyster Perpetual 41\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Compare the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 124300 vs 134300 &amp; see what changed, including design, case, movement, dial options, and more.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Bob&#039;s Watches\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bobswatches\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-02T19:11:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-07T20:45:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2180\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"700\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Paul Altieri\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@bobswatches\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@bobswatches\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Paul Altieri\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Paul Altieri\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/22b37643d599dce1a5947061baa91033\"},\"headline\":\"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Actually Changed on the Oyster Perpetual 41\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-02T19:11:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-07T20:45:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html\"},\"wordCount\":3110,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Editorial\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html\",\"name\":\"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Changed on Oyster Perpetual 41\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-02T19:11:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-07T20:45:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"Compare the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 124300 vs 134300 & see what changed, including design, case, movement, dial options, and more.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png\",\"width\":2180,\"height\":700,\"caption\":\"Rolex 124300 vs 134300\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\\\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Bob's Watches\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Blog\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Editorial\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/editorial\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Actually Changed on the Oyster Perpetual 41\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bob&#039;s Watches\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Bob's Watches\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/bobs-watches-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/bobs-watches-logo.png\",\"width\":600,\"height\":138,\"caption\":\"Bob's Watches\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/bobswatches\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/bobswatches\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/bobswatches\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/bobs-watches\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.pinterest.com\\\/BobsWatches\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/bobswatches\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\\\/rolex-blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/22b37643d599dce1a5947061baa91033\",\"name\":\"Paul Altieri\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50af9d21f497d6059e6da43edc940c99353eec96f9c4db365b54db9d3135c1b0?s=96&d=mm&r=gfb4a2a02993ff88bb170deea88d2fb81\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50af9d21f497d6059e6da43edc940c99353eec96f9c4db365b54db9d3135c1b0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50af9d21f497d6059e6da43edc940c99353eec96f9c4db365b54db9d3135c1b0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Paul Altieri\"},\"description\":\"Paul Altieri is a vintage and pre-owned Rolex specialist, entrepreneur, and the founder and CEO of BobsWatches.com. - the largest and most trusted name in luxury watches. He is widely considered a pioneer in the industry for bringing transparency and innovation to a once-considered stagnant industry. His experience spans over 35 years and he has been published in numerous publications including Forbes, The NY Times, WatchPro, and Fortune Magazine. Paul is committed to staying up-to-date with the latest research and developments in the watch industry and e-commerce, and regularly engages with other professionals in the industry. He is a member of the IWJG, the AWCI and a graduate of the GIA. Alongside running the premier retailer of pre-owned Rolex watches, Paul is a prominent Rolex watch collector himself amassing one of the largest private collections of rare timepieces. In an interview with the WSJ lifestyle\\\/fashion editor Christina Binkley, Paul opened his vault to display his extensive collection of vintage Rolex Submariners and Daytonas. Paul Altieri is a trusted and recognized authority in the watch industry with a proven track record of expertise, professionalism, and commitment to excellence.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.bobswatches.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/en.wikipedia.org\\\/wiki\\\/Bobs_Watches\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Changed on Oyster Perpetual 41","description":"Compare the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 124300 vs 134300 & see what changed, including design, case, movement, dial options, and more.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Changed on Oyster Perpetual 41","og_description":"Compare the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 124300 vs 134300 & see what changed, including design, case, movement, dial options, and more.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html","og_site_name":"Bob&#039;s Watches","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bobswatches","article_published_time":"2026-10-02T19:11:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-07T20:45:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2180,"height":700,"url":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Paul Altieri","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@bobswatches","twitter_site":"@bobswatches","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Paul Altieri","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html"},"author":{"name":"Paul Altieri","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/22b37643d599dce1a5947061baa91033"},"headline":"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Actually Changed on the Oyster Perpetual 41","datePublished":"2026-10-02T19:11:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-07T20:45:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html"},"wordCount":3110,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png","articleSection":["Editorial"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html","url":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html","name":"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Changed on Oyster Perpetual 41","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png","datePublished":"2026-10-02T19:11:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-07T20:45:00+00:00","description":"Compare the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 124300 vs 134300 & see what changed, including design, case, movement, dial options, and more.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/rolex-124300-vs-134300-watches-compared-hero.png","width":2180,"height":700,"caption":"Rolex 124300 vs 134300"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial\/rolex-124300-vs-134300.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Bob's Watches","item":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Editorial","item":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/editorial"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Rolex 124300 vs 134300: What Actually Changed on the Oyster Perpetual 41"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/","name":"Bob&#039;s Watches","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#organization","name":"Bob's Watches","url":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/bobs-watches-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/bobs-watches-logo.png","width":600,"height":138,"caption":"Bob's Watches"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/bobswatches","https:\/\/x.com\/bobswatches","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/bobswatches\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/bobs-watches\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/BobsWatches\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/bobswatches"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/#\/schema\/person\/22b37643d599dce1a5947061baa91033","name":"Paul Altieri","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50af9d21f497d6059e6da43edc940c99353eec96f9c4db365b54db9d3135c1b0?s=96&d=mm&r=gfb4a2a02993ff88bb170deea88d2fb81","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50af9d21f497d6059e6da43edc940c99353eec96f9c4db365b54db9d3135c1b0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50af9d21f497d6059e6da43edc940c99353eec96f9c4db365b54db9d3135c1b0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Paul Altieri"},"description":"Paul Altieri is a vintage and pre-owned Rolex specialist, entrepreneur, and the founder and CEO of BobsWatches.com. - the largest and most trusted name in luxury watches. He is widely considered a pioneer in the industry for bringing transparency and innovation to a once-considered stagnant industry. His experience spans over 35 years and he has been published in numerous publications including Forbes, The NY Times, WatchPro, and Fortune Magazine. Paul is committed to staying up-to-date with the latest research and developments in the watch industry and e-commerce, and regularly engages with other professionals in the industry. He is a member of the IWJG, the AWCI and a graduate of the GIA. Alongside running the premier retailer of pre-owned Rolex watches, Paul is a prominent Rolex watch collector himself amassing one of the largest private collections of rare timepieces. In an interview with the WSJ lifestyle\/fashion editor Christina Binkley, Paul opened his vault to display his extensive collection of vintage Rolex Submariners and Daytonas. Paul Altieri is a trusted and recognized authority in the watch industry with a proven track record of expertise, professionalism, and commitment to excellence.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bobs_Watches"]}]}},"authors":[{"term_id":2286,"user_id":2,"is_guest":0,"slug":"paul","display_name":"Paul Altieri","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50af9d21f497d6059e6da43edc940c99353eec96f9c4db365b54db9d3135c1b0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","author_category":"","user_url":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com","last_name":"Altieri","first_name":"Paul","job_title":"","description":"Paul Altieri is a vintage and pre-owned Rolex specialist, entrepreneur, and the founder and CEO of BobsWatches.com. - the largest and most trusted name in luxury watches. He is widely considered a pioneer in the industry for bringing transparency and innovation to a once-considered stagnant industry.  His experience spans over 35 years and he has been published in numerous publications including Forbes, The NY Times, WatchPro, and Fortune Magazine. Paul is committed to staying up-to-date with the latest research and developments in the watch industry and e-commerce, and regularly engages with other professionals in the industry. He is a member of the IWJG, the AWCI and a graduate of the GIA. \r\n\r\nAlongside running the premier retailer of pre-owned Rolex watches, Paul is a prominent Rolex watch collector himself amassing one of the largest private collections of rare timepieces. In an interview with the WSJ lifestyle\/fashion editor Christina Binkley, Paul opened his vault to display his extensive collection of vintage Rolex Submariners and Daytonas. \r\n\r\nPaul Altieri is a trusted and recognized authority in the watch industry with a proven track record of expertise, professionalism, and commitment to excellence."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72497"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72497\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72551,"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72497\/revisions\/72551"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/72500"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72497"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bobswatches.com\/rolex-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=72497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}