We asked our writers to weigh in and give us their opinions on what’s hot and what’s not in the world of Luxury Watches
One of the best things about the luxury watch community is diversity. No two people have the exact same taste in watches, and that makes for great dialogue and stirs up some spirited debates. So, in the spirit of discussion, we asked our writers to tell us a little about their taste in watches by picking their favorite, and least favorite, luxury watches. Let’s take a look.
Favorite Watch: Rolex Sea-Dweller 4000 ref. 116600
When you write about watches for a living, being asked which is your favorite is something that happens fairly often. And, much like choosing a favorite song, the answer tends to change depending on the mood I’m in. However, just as I’ll always come back to Let it Be if pressed, I seem to constantly side with the Rolex Sea-Dweller 4000 ref. 116600 for my standout timepiece.
If I had to choose, I’d go with The Sea-Dweller 116600
For me, it is the one that got everything right. It marked the return of the model after a long, Deepsea-enforced absence. It was only around for three years, so it has a built-in scarcity value. It was the first of the breed with a Maxi case and Cerachrom bezel but the last with a 40mm diameter. And, crucially, it was also the last Sea-Dweller without the Cyclops above its date window. Unlike most Rolex fans, I don’t have particularly strong feelings over the magnifying lens one way or another, but on my SD, I prefer the symmetry of the dial without it.
So, in my own humble opinion, it has the perfect blend of traditional and modern design elements. A robust and stylish everyday wear with a fantastic heritage, what more could you ask for?
Least Favorite Watch: Bell & Ross BR 01-92
My least favorite is quite a painful admission for me, mainly because I love the rest of the output from this brand. But the Bell and Ross BR 01-92 hits my eye as a great, ugly square slab, free of any of the graceful elegance I look for in a watch.
Congrats, Bell and Ross. You made a brick.
Designed to mirror the look of an aircraft cockpit, which it certainly does, its huge dimensions and four exposed screws lack any kind of subtlety, and I don’t think it has aged well. It’s not that I don’t like square watches; TAG Heuer’s Monaco and the Cartier Santos will always be near the top of my personal wish list, and even the smaller BR range from Bell and Ross look pretty good. But the 46mm BR 01-92 is a real love or hate watch, and I know which side I’m on.
Favorite Watch: Rolex Rainbow Daytona In Everose Gold
The coolest luxury watch in the world is the Rainbow Daytona in Everose Gold.
The Rainbow Daytona is my pick for coolest watch in the world
This watch is the epitome of luxury. It’s big. It’s gaudy. It’s sophisticated. It’s Rolex. Now I’m not normally one for obnoxiously overpriced watches, but here’s the thing: Rolex absolutely killed it with this watch. The attention to detail is astounding. In fact, I’m honestly surprised this watch isn’t more expensive than the modest $100k price tag it has been given. Between the 36 baguette-set sapphires, the 56 diamonds set into the lugs, and the colored sapphire indexes, the Rolex Cosmograph Daytona reference 116595RBOW doesn’t whisper luxury – it f***ing screams it.
Don’t agree? Fight me. (Cara Barrett, back me up here)
Least Favorite Watch: Paul Newman Daytona Chronograph
If I see another auction for a Paul Newman Daytona I’m going to lose it.
Live footage of the Phillips Auction house
I get it. Paul Newman was cool and Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid was a great movie. But the fact that Paul Newman wore one every day doesn’t mean the watch should instantly be valued at over $1,000,000, let alone nearly $18,000,000. If that’s the case, I know a guy who knows a guy that bumped into Paul Newman on the streets of New York and now his denim jacket is worth enough to pay off my student loan debt.
In all honesty, the Paul Newman Daytona is a decent looking watch. But as we have repeatedly learned from top 40 radio, you really can have too much of a good thing. Case and point: Despacito.
Favorite Watch: Breitling Navitimer 1 Automatic 38
I’m still drooling over the Navitimer 1 Automatic 38 that Breitling presented at Baselworld this year.
The Breitling Navitimer 1 Automatic 38 is something even the harshest Breitling critics can appreciate
To many people’s surprise, it’s not a chronograph. But what this watch lacks in precision it makes up for in 1950’s vintage-inspired elegance — from the deliberately unisex sizing to that striking beaded bezel.
At 38mm, the bezel is a perfect fit for anyone. And the fact that it’s not a chronograph means no more clutter. A Breitling with a legible dial? Sign me up.
Least Favorite Watch: Rainbow Daytona
My least favorite watches are over the top, so naturally, a timepiece like the Rainbow Rolex Daytona bothers me.
Gaudy or gorgeous?
This watch is iconic for its bizarre-turned-adored face (thanks, Paul Newman). So, why take away from that with such an ostentatious display of sapphires?
Favorite Watch: Speedy!
My favorite watch is the Omega Speedmaster 3184.108.40.206.01.001. What makes this watch so cool? Easy – its history.
The Omega Speedmaster 3220.127.116.11.01.001
In case you didn’t already know, the Speedmaster was the first watch on the moon. It was also the watch that helped save multiple lives on the Apollo 13 spacecraft during a critical mission. The watch was used to time a 14-second maneuver that proved critical in returning the crew back to earth.
How many lives were saved with a Rolex Submariner? The GMT? Daytona? To my knowledge, none.
Aside from the history of the watch, the Speedy has a handful of striking features, including its alpha hands and subtle subdials.
Now I know what you’re thinking – “leather stap? Really?” Save it. I’ve heard it all. And I’ll admit, I’ve always thought the choice to go with a leather strap was kind of a downer. But in spite of Omega’s choice to opt out of the metal bracelet, this watch is still masterfully woven together. I guess we’ll just need to forgive Omega for that little mishap.
Least Favorite Watch: GMT-Master 126711
This thing made its debut at Baselworld 2018 and it is getting tons of love for no reason.
The Rolex GMT-Master II 126711 is getting a lot of love for no reason at all
The two tone look on the bracelet and the face has always bewildered me and this new mocha-like combination will probably (hopefully) fade pretty soon. Unlike its full Everose counterpart, the Rolex GMT-Master II 126711 doesn’t display the same level of class. Plus, it looks like the UPS logo (you didn’t hear it from me).
What’s more, the two-tone “Root Beer” GMT is priced at nearly triple that of my beloved Speedy. Three times the price for a sub-optimal timepiece? No thank you.
That being said, everyone is entitled to their own opinion: especially in the watch community. In all reality, the most important thing is buying a watch that has value to you. After all, isn’t that why you’re buying it in the first place?
Favorite Watch: The Omega Speedmaster
The Omega Speedmaster is my favorite watch for many reasons.
The Omega Speedmaster has a timeless, classy, style
The chronograph and tachymeter functions create a watch that is timeless and easy to wear. Also known as the “Moon Watch”, early variations of the Speedmaster have been present during every NASA mission, including Buzz Aldrin’s first steps on the moon. With a history like that, it’s hard to deny the Speedmaster’s status as a must-have watch.
Least Favorite Watch: The Breitling Navitimer
My least favorite watch is anything with a case that is larger than 41 or 42mm.
A Breitling AND it’s 46mm? No thanks
That being said, anything with a case size as large as the The Breitling Navitimer immediately makes me cringe. Breitling is one of my least favorite brands in general, so that’s one strike against it. And, coming in at a whopping 46mm, the Navitimeter falls firmly within the “oversized and obnoxious” camp of watches. While this case size might be ideal for larger wrists, I’m just not a fan of the style of really large watches.
Favorite Watch: The Zenith Defy El Primero 21
Narrowing things down to a single watch is a huge challenge for me, as my tastes are incredibly varied, to say the least. Sticking with something that wouldn’t be near-impossible to track down, I’m going to go with one of Zenith’s releases from last year—The Defy El Primero 21
The Zenith El Primero 21 is an incredible watch
The reasons are threefold. First, its unique caliber is incredibly cool to see in a relatively affordable production watch. A 5Hz balance runs the standard time, whereas a 50Hz balance runs the chronograph, allowing for the timing of 1/100th of a second. The central chronograph hand rotates once every second, the subdial at 6 logs elapsed seconds, and the register at 3 displays a 30-minute chronograph counter.
Second, it wears incredibly well on the wrist. The 44mm diameter seem chunky, but with short lugs and a broad rubber strap it is surprisingly comfortable on a smaller wrist.
Third is a matter of value. This kind of high-tech chronograph wizardry isn’t something easy or cheap to execute, and yet the standard panda and reverse-panda dialed versions retail for a modest $9,600.
Least Favorite Watch: The Breitling Navitimer Super 8
Sadly this list is much longer than my list of favorites, but if I had to pick a watch that just doesn’t make sense to me in the current market, it would have to be the new Breitling Navitimer Super 8.
The Breitling Navitimer Super 8 comes in at a whopping 50mm
So many things are wrong with this watch. It’s modeled after a wrist-mounted stopwatch used in WWII for bombing missions, so its roots are already dark, however it doesn’t have a chronograph complication. Its crown protrudes obnoxiously from its case. Its brushed steel bezel is devoid of any sort of detail or counter, instead moving a tiny red triangle to register elapsed time.
Other than the hideous crown, its other true-to-original design detail is its obnoxiously large 50mm diameter. Why Breitling opted to go for an oversized case in an era where preferences are leaning back to more modest sizes, I’ll never know. And, while the green dial is somewhat on-trend, it is not enough to save this monstrosity.